Interest Groups

E-Discovery, Information Governance & Cyber Security Section News

Get the news you want the way you want it: click the RSS button in the right corner to add this feed to your RSS reader, or click here to subscribe to this content. By subscribing, you’ll find this news on your Member Account page, and the latest articles will be emailed to you in your customized IndyBar E-Bulletin e-newsletter.

E-Discovery, Information Governance & Cyber Security Section News


224 Posts found
Previous • Page 13 of 23 • Next
Posted on: Aug 1, 2019

Get to know members of the E-Discovery, Information Governance & Cybersecurity Section! This blog series highlights section members, their practice and their personal interests. Take a seat and get to know them! This week's post features Adam Ira of Kightlinger & Gray LLP.

Posted on: Jul 10, 2019

Get to know members of the E-Discovery, Information Governance & Cybersecurity Section! This blog series highlights section members, their practice and their personal interests. Take a seat and get to know them! This week's post features Robert Simmons of Wooden McLaughlin LLP.

Posted on: Jun 20, 2019

Good planning is the common denominator of successful e-discovery review projects. Planning builds on the work done during the identification, processing and analysis stages. Clear goals must be set at the outset. Finally, you need to assign the right people to the review team.

Posted on: May 16, 2019

Get to know members of the E-Discovery, Information Governance & Cybersecurity Section! This blog series highlights section members, their practice and their personal interests. Take a seat and get to know them! This week's post features Cheri Spicer, Indiana Education Employment Relations Board.

Posted on: May 14, 2019

This updated article highlights one approach to evaluating the selection of e-discovery vendors that may help decision makers by providing an objective framework useful for the competitive comparison and contrasting of subjective evaluation elements. While the components and ratings used in the approach may be adjusted and weighted based on the experiences and preference of evaluators, the framework is beneficial for ensuring a holistic evaluation process for determining vendor viability.

Posted on: Apr 30, 2019

The Indianapolis Bar Association’s recent CLE “An Introduction to Using and Refusing under Indiana’s Access to Public Records Act” was a valuable primer on the state’s version of FOIA. The program was a presentation of the E-Discovery, Information Governance & Cybersecurity Section. There are some similarities, but more differences between discovery requests and public records requests.

Posted on: Apr 4, 2019

Using eDiscovery analytics is a win-win scenario: higher-quality review at  lower  cost. Part one of this article described how analytics can be used strategically to improve review efficiency by grouping related documents and cut costs by leveraging technology to cull non-responsive documents. In part two, I give two more strategic reasons to use analytics.

Posted on: Mar 29, 2019

Get to know members of the E-Discovery, Information Governance & Cybersecurity Section! This blog series highlights section members, their practice and their personal interests. Take a seat and get to know them! This week's post features Michael Daniells of the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.

Posted on: Mar 28, 2019

Collaboration in eDiscovery has its own special challenges. First, communication between lawyers and technologists often requires translation. Second, participation is a prerequisite – but not a given. Third, continuing education and professional development  improves  collaboration.

Posted on: Mar 20, 2019

Purdue University cybersecurity experts have come up with an all-in-one toolkit to help detectives solve these crimes. Purdue has a reputation in this area—it is ranked among the top institutions for cybersecurity.


Previous • Page 13 of 23 • Next

DID YOU KNOW?

Indianapolis Bar Association (IndyBar) est. 1878 | 4,314 Members (as of 3.1.25)