New for 2017: take a look at this video message from section chair Charley Smith and get an idea of what you can expect from the Litigation Section this year.

Discovery motions are typically labor intensive for lawyers, time consuming for the court, expensive and bothersome for clients.

A federal district court compelled a patent litigation defendant to answer interrogatories which the defendant contended exceeded the numerical limit imposed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(a)(1).

The Indiana Court of Appeals recently addressed the applicability of the economic loss doctrine to a claim for accounting malpractice.

This great article outlines some great information for both cyclists and automobile operators sharing the road with those cyclists. It’s important to know the rules and laws surrounding bikes for your safety and the safety of others.

The role of the jury in protecting the rights of Americans in criminal and civil cases is the focus of a U.S. Courts video discussion featuring two U.S. district judges, a clerk of court, and a law professor and author on the jury process.

Stay informed with the recent meeting minutes from the Litigation Section Executive Committee.

The IndyBar Legislative Committee is currently monitoring the following litigation related legislation.

In the past two years, the Indiana appellate courts have issued several decisions addressing the award of attorneys’ fees in civil litigation. This is the first in an occasional series addressing these decisions.

A litigant may wonder, for example, about the extent to which a judge will permit a member of the gallery or another attorney to post on Twitter regarding the happenings in the courtroom. On its face, such an act probably appears to fall within the “broadcasting” prohibited under Rule 2.17.