Interest Groups

Explained: Harkins v. Westmeyer - Litigation News

Get the news you want the way you want it: click the RSS button in the right corner to add this feed to your RSS reader, or click here to subscribe to this content. By subscribing, you’ll find this news on your Member Account page, and the latest articles will be emailed to you in your customized IndyBar E-Bulletin e-newsletter.

Litigation News

Posted on: Dec 18, 2018

By Arend J. Abel, Cohen & Malad LLP

A December 10 decision by the Indiana Court of Appeals held that the three-day extension for service by mail does not apply if a court order sets a deadline that runs from the date of its order. In Harkins v. Westmeyer, the court explained that the rule only applies where a deadline runs from “service” of a paper or “notice” of an order that is served by mail. In Harkins, the deadline was set to run “from the date of this order,” so the extension did not apply. The decision stands as an important reminder that counsel (or pro se parties, as in Harkins) should not assume a deadline benefits from the three-day extension simply because the paper setting the deadline is received by mail.

If you would like to submit content or write an article for the Litigation Section, please email Kara Sikorski at


Indianapolis Bar Association (IndyBar) est. 1878 | 4,536 Members (as of 2.11.21)