Interest Groups

Developments in Drug Labels as “Prior Art” at PTAB - Intellectual Property News

Get the news you want the way you want it: click the RSS button in the right corner to add this feed to your RSS reader, or click here to subscribe to this content. By subscribing, you’ll find this news on your Member Account page, and the latest articles will be emailed to you in your customized IndyBar E-Bulletin e-newsletter.

Intellectual Property News


Posted on: Dec 4, 2019

By John Bishop, Cohen Garelick & Glazier PC

Historically, parties challenging patents covering pharmaceuticals and biologics often used drug product labels as prior art before PTAB. However, recent decisions in Celltrion, Inc. v. Biogen, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH demonstrate that a date printed on a drug label with no other evidence supporting that date is insufficient to demonstrate that the label was publicly available as of the printed date.

In this regard, the Federal Circuit has previously reasoned that “whether a reference is a ‘printed publication’ is a ‘case-by-case inquiry into the facts and circumstances surrounding the reference’s disclosure to members of the public.’” Jazz Pharm., Inc. v. Amneal Pharm., LLC, 895 F.3d 1347, 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (quoting In re Klopfenstein, 380 F.3d 1345, 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2004)). Nevertheless, best practices would suggest that petitioners check noted publications such as a pharmacopeia or the Physicians’ Desk Reference for a prior art entry for the drug label of interest and/or look for archived versions of the drug label of interest using internet archiving websites to support a public availability argument.

Source: Aziz Burgy & Christopher Gallo, IPwatchdog.com, November 13, 2019.

If you would like to submit content or write an article for the Intellectual Property Section, please email Kara Sikorski at ksikorski@indybar.org.

DID YOU KNOW?

Indianapolis Bar Association (IndyBar) est. 1878 | 4,536 Members (as of 2.11.21)