Interest Groups

Seventh Circuit Finds Superfund Cost Recovery Suit Untimely - Environmental Law News

Get the news you want the way you want it: click the RSS button in the right corner to add this feed to your RSS reader, or click here to subscribe to this content. By subscribing, you’ll find this news on your Member Account page, and the latest articles will be emailed to you in your customized IndyBar E-Bulletin e-newsletter.

Environmental Law News

Posted on: Sep 11, 2019

By Ben Wolowski, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

The Seventh Circuit recently affirmed a district court decision finding that too much time had passed for the owner of a lead smelting site to seek cost recovery from a former owner under Superfund. The decision was handed down on August 22, 2019, in Refined Metals Corp. v. NL Industries, Inc., No. 18–3235 (7th Circuit Aug. 22, 2019). 

Refined Metal Corp., the current owner of a contaminated site in Beech Grove, Indiana, filed suit in 2017. However, the site’s former owner, NL Industries, Inc., entered into settlements over the site with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management in 1998 and received covenants not to sue from both agencies. The three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit concluded that Refined Metals Corp. waited too long to seek a contribution for clean-up costs from under section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a).

The court's full opinion is available here.

If you would like to submit content or write an article for the Environmental Law Section, please email Kara Sikorski at


Indianapolis Bar Association (IndyBar) est. 1878 | 4,536 Members (as of 2.11.21)