Interest Groups

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) Stay Lifted by D.C. Circuit - Environmental Law News

Get the news you want the way you want it: click the RSS button in the right corner to add this feed to your RSS reader, or click here to subscribe to this content. By subscribing, you’ll find this news on your Member Account page, and the latest articles will be emailed to you in your customized IndyBar E-Bulletin e-newsletter.

Environmental Law News

Posted on: Nov 5, 2014

This article was originally published on the blog of Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP. You can see its original posting here.

By Kathleen E. Beatty, Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP

On Oct. 23, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted U.S. EPA’s June request to lift the stay on the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR or Transport Rule).

Under the Transport Rule, upwind states, including Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio, are required to significantly reduce power plant emissions that contribute to ozone and/or fine particle pollution in downwind states.

Brief Transport Rule History
The stay was issued in December 2011 while the D.C. Circuit heard litigation over the Transport Rule in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA. In its August 2012 ruling on EME Homer City Generation, the D.C. Circuit invalidated the Transport Rule stating that the rule exceeded U.S. EPA’s Clean Air Act authority. In April 2014, the Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit’s ruling, reinstating the Transport Rule. 

In its June 26, 2014, motion, U.S. EPA requested that the court lift the stay of the Transport Rule and delay the Transport Rule compliance deadlines by three years, so the first emissions budgets of the rule would apply in 2015 (rather than 2012 and 2013).

What's Next?
Although the Oct. 23 order granted U.S. EPA’s request that the stay be lifted, it did not explicitly grant U.S. EPA’s request to delay the Transport Rule compliance deadlines by three years.

The order also established a briefing deadline for the remaining lawsuits to be resolved which address specific provisions of the Transport Rule. The initial briefs are due Dec. 10, 2014, for industry and states opposed to the rule.

For more information regarding the Transport Rule and the previous rulings, please see the First Quarter 2014 Air Quality Letter

This post was written by Kathleen E. Beatty, Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP. If you would like to submit content or write an article for the Environmental Law Section page, please email Mary Kay Price at


Indianapolis Bar Association (IndyBar) est. 1878 | 4,536 Members (as of 2.11.21)