Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court unanimously voted to reject the recommendation of three Indianapolis Bar Association sections to allow citations of memorandum decisions. The Appellate Practice Section Task Force crafted this proposal of their recommendations, which received support and approval from the Appellate Practice, Criminal Justice and Litigation sections of the IndyBar. The proposal recommended that citations of all Indiana appellate opinions should be allowed. As the rule currently stands, nearly 75 percent of the Indiana Court of Appeals' opinions are issued as memorandum (not-for-publication) decisions.
The Indiana Supreme Court's ruling was announced on Friday, September 5.
IndyBar member and IU Robert H. McKinney School of Law professor Joel Schumm provided commentary on the ruling in this post. He notes that the Indiana Supreme Court's decision "defies the modern reality of 'memorandum decisions' being easily accessible". As this post on Appellate Advocacy Blog notes for an example, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 permits citation of all opinions issued after its passage.
Schumm's post goes on to provide ways for lawyers to cite helpful memorandum decisions despite the current rule in Indiana. IndyBar Appellate Practice Section Chair Stephen J. Peters of Harrison & Moberly LLP notes, "Trial and appellate counsel...should know their options and the consequences for noncompliance. This is a very real problem faced by civil and criminal attorneys in Indiana trial and appellate courts, so we need to provide information, comments and suggestions for how to professionally and ethically deal with this issue."
This content was submitted by Stephen J. Peters of Harrison & Moberly LLP. If you would like to submit content or write a post for the Criminal Justice Section page, please email Mary Kay Price at firstname.lastname@example.org.