Interest Groups

Empirical SCOTUS: Follow the Experts in Framing Petitions for Cert - Appellate Practice News

Get the news you want the way you want it: click the RSS button in the right corner to add this feed to your RSS reader, or click here to subscribe to this content. By subscribing, you’ll find this news on your Member Account page, and the latest articles will be emailed to you in your customized IndyBar E-Bulletin e-newsletter.

Appellate Practice News

Posted on: Dec 4, 2018

From SCOTUSblog:

The age of big data is upon us. Data in law is ubiquitous, informative of past decisions and helpful in prognosticating future results. How we make use of this data is often a topic of debate. One view holds that large amounts of processed information can inform legal decision-making. Lawyers taking this approach try to maximize the use of this abundant information. A particular area of Supreme Court practice in which big data can improve lawyers’ decisions is in the case-selection stage. With well over 7,000 annual petitions for certiorari, the justices and their clerks must wade through what may seem like an infinite number of pages in order to pare down to the 70 or so cases they hear in a term.

Read more.

This article was submitted by Josh Tatum, Plews Shadley Racher & Braun LLP. If you would like to submit content or write an article for the Appellate Practice Section, please email Kara Sikorski at


Indianapolis Bar Association (IndyBar) est. 1878 | 4,536 Members (as of 2.11.21)