Interest Groups

Sparring Between Justices Ginsburg and Gorsuch - Appellate Practice News

Get the news you want the way you want it: click the RSS button in the right corner to add this feed to your RSS reader, or click here to subscribe to this content. By subscribing, you’ll find this news on your Member Account page, and the latest articles will be emailed to you in your customized IndyBar E-Bulletin e-newsletter.

Appellate Practice News

Posted on: Jan 29, 2018

By Libby Yin Goodknight, Krieg DeVault LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court made headlines recently with an otherwise obscure, highly-technical case involving the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute’s tolling provision. Artis v. District of Columbia made headlines not so much for the substantive issues involved, but for the sparring between Justice Ruther Bader Ginsburg, who wrote the majority opinion, and Justice Neil Gorsuch, who authored the dissent. Slate approaches the story from a slightly different angle, in an article that is an interesting read (regardless of your politics) for appellate practitioners whose bread and butter is legal writing. In Neil Gorsuch Is a Terrible Writer, the magazine takes a deep dive into Justice Gorsuch’s writing style – in Artis and in other cases.  

The Supreme Court’s decision can be found here.
The Slate article can be found here.

If you would like to submit content or write an article for the Appellate Practice Section, please email Kara Sikorski at


Indianapolis Bar Association (IndyBar) est. 1878 | 4,536 Members (as of 2.11.21)