Interest Groups

Lessons in Arbitration from Masters v. Masters - Alternative Dispute Resolution News

Get the news you want the way you want it: click the RSS button in the right corner to add this feed to your RSS reader, or click here to subscribe to this content. By subscribing, you’ll find this news on your Member Account page, and the latest articles will be emailed to you in your customized IndyBar E-Bulletin e-newsletter.

Alternative Dispute Resolution News


Posted on: Dec 2, 2014

By Detra Mills, Mills Law

An arbitrator's judgment may be found clearly erroneous on appeal if the arbitrator awards attorney fees during a dissolution proceeding without taking into account the party's ability to pay the award. Further, the arbitrator's findings of fact must disclose the valid basis for the legal result reached relative to a party's ability to pay such an award.

The failure of the arbitrator to enter such findings in Masters v. Masters (02A04-1404-DR-178) led the Indiana Court of Appeals to remand to the Trial Court with instructions to enter a reasonable attorney fee award. See http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/10291401ewn.pdf.

You can find more information here from its coverage in the Indiana Lawyer.

This post was written by Detra Mills of Mills Law. If you would like to submit content or write an article for the ADR Section page, please email Mary Kay Price at mprice@indybar.org.

DID YOU KNOW?

Indianapolis Bar Association (IndyBar) est. 1878 | 4,536 Members (as of 2.11.21)