Government Practice Section Awards Scholarship to Carrie Brennan

The IndyBar’s Government Practice Section awarded its third annual scholarship to Carrie Brennan of the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.

As attorneys who represent government agencies, or who assist clients in matters involving government agencies, the members of the Government Practice Section award the $1,000 scholarship to a second- or third-year law student with a strong academic record and a demonstrated interest in government practice.

This year, the Section’s Executive Committee reviewed applications from talented students attending each of Indiana’s law schools. The Section commends Ms. Brennan for standing out among a group of intelligent, motivated, and service-minded applicants.

Posted in Legal News | Leave a comment

Changes in Marion County Courts and Other Observations

By The Hon. Tim Oakes, Marion Superior Court

Forty years ago this year, the headlines in the Indianapolis Star read, “Demo ‘New Broom’ Sweeps GOP Off County Benches.” It was the post-Watergate election and voters let their thoughts be known through the ballot, not only here, but statewide and nationwide. Eight incumbent judges were thrown off the bench in the tidal wave, and Democrats won all 13 judgeships on the ballot that year. Names like Endsley, Tranberg, Barteau, Brewer, Jacobs, and yes, Zore and Chavis were swept into office. This would prompt a legislative change in how judges were selected. Many evidently believed the change (perceived by some to be a function of national politics versus judicial bench performance) was too much.

Similar, but not as dramatic, change is coming to the Marion County Superior Courts in January. The deadline for 2014 candidates passed June 30th. Since there are no independent challengers to those Superior Court judicial candidates elected in the Marion County primary, we know who will be leaving and who will be arriving on the bench in Jan. 2015.

Judges Ted Sosin, Patrick McCarty, Lou Rosenberg, David Shaheed and Gerald Zore are retiring. They have been great representatives of the Marion County judiciary for decades. Dave Cook has also done an outstanding job serving in Criminal Court 7 these past months.

P.J. Dietrick, Angela Dow-Davis, Shatrese Flowers, Christina Klineman and Marcel Pratt will take the bench Jan. 1, 2015. As such, new court assignments need to be made, and a timely decision allows for all interested parties to be informed in sufficient time to allow for, ideally, a smooth transition. The Marion County Executive Committee met Friday, Sept. 5, 2014, and pursuant to local rule and a vote, made the following court assignments beginning Jan. 2015:

Civil Court 1 – Heather Welch
Civil Court 2 – Tim Oakes
Civil Court 3 – Gary Miller
Civil Court 4 – Cynthia Ayers
Civil Court 5 – Robert Altice
Civil Court 6 – Tom Carroll
Civil Court 7 – Mike Keele
Civil Court 10 – David Dreyer
Civil Court 11 – John Hanley
Civil Court 12 – John Chavis
Civil Court 13 – James Joven
Civil Court 14 – Jim Osborn
Probate Court – Steve Eichholtz

In the Criminal Division, judges in the major felony courts 1 to 6 will remain the same with the exception of Shatrese Flowers being assigned to Major Felony Drug Court, Court 20.

The new judge assignments in the other criminal courts include:

Criminal Court 7 – Clayton Graham
Criminal Court 15 – Helen Marchal
Criminal Court 16 – Angela Dow-Davis
Criminal Court 17 – Christina Klineman
Criminal Court 21 – P.J. Dietrick
Traffic Court (13) – Marcel Pratt

Change can be frustrating and occasionally produce some anxiety, especially to lawyers and their clients. The Marion County bench has been in a period of transition since 2000 and has weathered the changes well. Of the judges who were on the bench in January 2000, only five will remain as of January 2015. (Can you name them? Hint: They will all be on a Civil Bench in January 2015.) Not since that election of 1974 has there been such a period of change on the Marion County bench. Some judges have moved on to different judicial roles – former Superior Court judges Bradford, Moberly, Stinson, and Pratt for example. Many have retired and some have lost elections during that time. Sadly, some have also passed away.

Though the Indiana Legislature did away with the mandatory retirement age of 75 for Indiana Trial Court judges recently, the list of Marion County judicial officers may look equally different in another 15 years. Whether only five of our current 36 are still around remains to be seen, but it is always possible.

Judicial Surveys
In researching these changes, I also was curious as to how incumbent judges have scored on the IndyBar judicial surveys over the years. The bar conducts surveys of its members on the performance of judicial officers and judicial candidates in the months prior to a judicial election. It is not a perfect system, nor, to my knowledge, does it represent itself to be. For example, candidates who are not incumbent judicial officers tend to score lower initially than they typically do after their first term on the bench. It remains doubtful that candidates suddenly become better at all the factors the survey measures merely because they ascended to the bench. As one Lake County Judicial Nominating Commission member recently said, “No one ever has their personality improved by being selected to serve on the bench. We can only hope it doesn’t become worse.” Thus, only surveys conducted of judicial officers after their first term were considered.

The spread of the IndyBar’s published surveys over the past 15 years has found them amazingly consistent. In short, most sitting judges have been rated well by those participating in the surveys. We now have slightly more sitting judges scoring above 90 percent on the recommended-to-serve portion than at any other time in the last 15 years. The difference is not that large to show a trend, but more of the Marion County judges are scoring above 90 percent recommended now than ever before.

While I have not reviewed judicial surveys in detail from around the country, I do have the opportunity, as part of my research for a law school seminar I co-teach with Professor Joel Schumm on Judicial Selection, to see and read many different articles from other states on judicial surveys by lawyers. I cannot recall seeing other surveys that rank their judges as well as the Marion County judiciary. There are always exceptions, but it is good to know that IndyBar surveys generally show that an increasing number of lawyers hold our Marion County judiciary in an increasingly favorable opinion.

There is always room for improvement. I personally welcome any constructive instruction on how we might better interact and work with lawyers and litigants to serve their needs, and I am confident most of my colleagues would agree.•

Third year Indiana University McKinney School of Law Student Joanne Rouse and second year McKinney Law Student Addison Bradford assisted in the research of this article.

Posted in Legal News | Leave a comment

miniBar Talk: This Week’s Top Post!

Bar Talk Header

Serving Legal Papers Over Facebook Gets the Green Light

Usually, the little red notifications on Facebook trigger a positive response – a new “like”, comment or message has come through! But for one woman, her notification will be the first of its kind: she’ll be notified that she’s been served legal papers from her ex-husband.

In Staten Island, Magistrate Gregory Gliedman ruled that a man may send his ex-wife legal papers over Facebook after traditional means failed. The woman had no forwarding mail address and yet maintained an active Facebook profile. Therefore, Gliedman ruled, this was a “means by which he can contact” her.

Read more about the first ruling of its kind in this article.

To subscribe to more Family Law news like the article above, click here to update your news subscriptions. Your news subscriptions appear in your bi-weekly E-Bulletin and on your personalized IndyBar homepage.

Keep an eye out for our newest e-newsletter for members, Bar Talk, featuring the top IndyBar posts each month!

Posted in Bar Talk | Leave a comment

Interrogatories: Candid Q&A with Jack Kenney

By Tyler D. Helmond, Voyles Zahn & Paul

He is a graduate of Indiana University and the Indiana University Maurer School of Law. He was a private practice attorney in Elkhart and Indianapolis prior to joining the Indiana Public Defender Council (IPDC) in 1994. He is Jack Kenney, and he has been served with interrogatories.

You have spent a significant portion of your professional life writing and researching the Indiana criminal code. What was your first reaction when you heard it was being revised?
Surprise, given the fact that the prosecutors killed the original criminal code reform bill in 2011 (SB 561). At the same time I felt a bit overwhelmed at the prospect of starting over and dealing with the amount of new information to learn and convey to others. I was also hopeful Indiana seemed to be moving toward more proportionality among crimes and sentences across the criminal code, focusing more on rehabilitation, treatment and being smart rather than indiscriminately tough on crime and building more prisons. I knew our agency could help make a difference in achieving those goals.

What issues with the new code are you eager to see litigated?
The retroactivity of the amended sentence modification statute and appellate review of significant disparate sentences for the same behavior under the old code. There will also be issues that come up when the new traffic code takes effect next year. For example, whether judges will exercise discretion to issue specialized driver’s licenses rather than suspending licenses.

What is your approach to handling major writing projects?
Develop a long-term plan and try to make it an ongoing process. Block out significant chunks of time, and seek out second opinions and proofreading wherever possible. When all else fails, push it off to co-workers, independent contractors and/or law students.

What do you do when you aren’t working on publications?
Talking to lawyers from around the state about their cases. Responding to requests for assistance.

What are the three most essential reference books on your shelf?
IPDC manuals–especially evidence, search and seizure, and sentencing. Also Indiana Criminal and Traffic Law Manual.

What is your favorite part about working for IPDC?
The relationships I have developed over 20 years with the IPDC staff, board members and public defenders throughout Indiana. Learning and sharing developments in criminal law and collaborating with others about raising and arguing various issues. And to be honest, celebrating Columbus Day with a day off work is pretty nice.

Do you feel any rivalry with the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council (IPAC)?
No, I do not deal with IPAC very often. Many times we are on the same page, along with the Judicial Center, in promoting a more effective and reliable criminal justice system. We’ve had disagreements on legislative issues and criminal justice policy, but I don’t feel that it is a rivalry.

If you had to have another job, what would it be?
Practicing law with my wife, Stacy Uliana, who has a criminal defense practice. If you’re asking what my dream job would be, I’d like to retire after my kids grow up and work as a bartender in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Westlaw or Lexis?
I like Westlaw, but our office and most of IPDC members use Lexis. The Shepard’s function from Lexis is helpful, but frustratingly inaccurate at times.•

Posted in Legal News | Leave a comment

IndyBar Member Headlines: Thursday, September 25

Share your news with the IndyBar by contacting Mary Kay Price, Director of Marketing & Communications, at

Larissa E. Koshatka has joined Quarles & Brady LLP as an associate in the commercial litigation practice group.

Brooke Jones has joined Cordell & Cordell’s office as an associate.

Jill McGinnis has joined Wanzer Edwards PC as an associate. She practices in the areas of family, collaborative and criminal law.

Charles Dunlap of the Indiana Bar Foundation has been elected president of the National Association of IOLTA Programs through June 2015.

Finalists for the 2014 listing of Indy’s Best and Brightest were announced. The list honors 100 of Central Indiana’s most accomplished young professionals, age 40 and under. Each of the finalists in the legal category are IndyBar members. Congratulations to all!
Tracy N. Betz of Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
Aaron Dixon of Ice Miller LLP
Angela B. Freeman of Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Tavonna Harris Askew of Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County
Jeremy Hill of Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP
Michele L. Jackson of Harden Jackson Law LLC
Laurie E. Martin of Hoover Hull LLP
Sara Powell of Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Todd Relue of Plews Shadley Racher & Braun LLP
Kyra Wagoner of Barnes & Thornburg LLP

Jeremy Overmyer has joined Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP in their Corporate and Transactional practice group with a focus on health care, privacy and regulatory matters.

Russell C. Menyhart of Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP has been appointed to serve on the board of directors for the America China Society of Indiana.

Bryce Bennett of Riley Bennett & Egloff LLP was honored for his donation to the Arts Council of Indianapolis with a plaque that was installed for him and the firm. Mayor Greg Ballard also expressed his appreciation. Read more here.

Joshua W. Abel, previously the executive director of the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic, has joined Faegre Baker Daniels LLP in the firm’s nonprofit organizations group.

Posted in Member News | Leave a comment

Nominations Now Open for Recognition Awards

This fall, IndyBar members will be honored for their contributions to our legal community. The Indianapolis legal community is fortunate to be home to many talented, dedicated professionals, and we need your help in identifying our colleagues who went above and beyond in 2014.

Nominations are being accepted for the following IndyBar awards: the Dr. John Morton Finney Jr. Award for Excellence in Legal Education and the IndyBar Pro Bono Awards, which are presented in five categories: Practicing Attorney, Aiding Individuals; Practicing Attorney, Aiding Entities; Law Firm; Law Student and Paralegal. Nomination forms can be found here. Nominations are due Friday, Oct. 3, 2014.

The Pro Bono Awards honor practicing lawyers, retired lawyers, in-house and corporate counsel, law firms, law students and paralegals who have made outstanding contributions toward delivering volunteer legal services to the poor and disadvantaged. Among the factors considered during selection are whether a nominee has demonstrated dedication to the delivery of legal services to the poor; has contributed significant work toward developing innovative approaches to the delivery of volunteer legal services; has participated in an activity which resulted in satisfying previously unmet needs or in extending services to underserved segments of the population; has successfully litigated a pro bono case that favorably affected the provision of services to the poor; or has successfully achieved legislation that contributed substantially to legal services to the poor.

Established in 1998, the Dr. John A. Morton Finney Award for Excellence in Legal Education honors the memory of Dr. Finney who, during his lifetime, demonstrated the value of education and a love of the law. The successful candidate for this award will have made significant and unique contributions to further legal education within our community. Those active in legal education projects, public education or working within Indiana’s law schools shall be considered.

The awards will be presented at the Recognition Luncheon on Thursday, Nov. 13. Registration for the luncheon will be open soon at

Posted in IndyBar News | Leave a comment

Getting Along is Not Wrong: Positive Influences from the Start

Civility. Courtesy. Respect. Professionalism.

These are words that should be synonymous with “Advocate,” but in a world of high stakes, strong opinions, and a general societal decline in basic manners, how can attorneys fight the good fight while living up to these ideals – especially if the other side doesn’t? We set out to find examples of lawyers who model the way while providing excellent representation.

Getting Along is Not Wrong, an initiative of the IndyBar Standing Committee on Professionalism, is the impressive collection of such positive and compelling behavior. Check out the entry below and continue checking back for future installments.

Magistrate Victoria M. Ransberger, Marion Superior Court –

My notions of civility and professionalism have been influenced over the years by more people than I could ever name. When I think back to the beginning of my professional career, I think of Ken Falk. I met Ken over 35 years ago when I was completing a Masters in Social Work. Ken spoke at one of my classes about representing parents in CHINS cases. Several years later, I interned at Legal Services from the law school clinic and he was one of my supervisors. In the early 90s, we were opposing counsel on a few cases. His demeanor, respect for his clients and his ability to work with opposing parties and counsel toward resolution of conflicts is a gold standard to which we should all aspire.

Posted in IndyBar News, Professionalism | Leave a comment

miniBar Talk: This Week’s Top Post!

Bar Talk Header

Proposal for Citation of Memorandum Decisions Unanimously Rejected

Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court unanimously voted to reject the recommendation of three Indianapolis Bar Association sections to allow citations of memorandum decisions. The Appellate Practice Section Task Force crafted this proposal of their recommendations, which received support and approval from the Appellate Practice, Criminal Justice and Litigation sections of the IndyBar. The proposal recommended that citations of all Indiana appellate opinions should be allowed. As the rule currently stands, nearly 75 percent of the Indiana Court of Appeals’ opinions are issued as memorandum (not-for-publication) decisions.

The Indiana Supreme Court’s ruling was announced on Friday, September 5.

IndyBar member and IU Robert H. McKinney School of Law professor Joel Schumm provided commentary on the ruling in this post. He notes that the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision “defies the modern reality of ‘memorandum decisions’ being easily accessible”. As this post on Appellate Advocacy Blog notes for an example, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 permits citation of all opinions issued after its passage.

Schumm’s post goes on to provide ways for lawyers to cite helpful memorandum decisions despite the current rule in Indiana. IndyBar Appellate Practice Section Chair Stephen J. Peters of Harrison & Moberly LLP notes, “Trial and appellate counsel…should know their options and the consequences for noncompliance. This is a very real problem faced by civil and criminal attorneys in Indiana trial and appellate courts, so we need to provide information, comments and suggestions for how to professionally and ethically deal with this issue.”

This content was submitted by Stephen J. Peters of Harrison & Moberly LLP. If you would like to submit content or write a post for the Litigation Section page, please email Mary Kay Price at

To subscribe to more Appellate Practice news like the article above, click here to update your news subscriptions. Your news subscriptions appear in your bi-weekly E-Bulletin and on your personalized IndyBar homepage.

Keep an eye out for our newest e-newsletter for members, Bar Talk, featuring the top IndyBar posts each month!

Posted in Bar Talk | Leave a comment

Duncan: The Impact of One for the Indianapolis Bar Foundation

By Dave Duncan, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP

I recently received an email from Julie Armstrong, the Indianapolis Bar Association and Foundation Executive Director, containing notes taken at the very first meeting of the Indianapolis Bar Foundation (IBF) over 40 years ago. The note reported the activities of the IBF from Dec. 29, 1969 through Dec. 31, 1970. It was enlightening to see how far our legal community has brought the IBF in the last 45 years.

Here are some metrics to put this in perspective: At the end of its first full year of operations, the IBF had 125 contributors (10 percent of the IndyBar membership), raised approximately $4,550 in contributions from its members and received two grants from the Lilly Endowment that totaled $5,000. Among its membership, the IBF had 25 Lifetime Fellows (pledging to contribute $50 for 10 years), 35 Sustaining Fellows (pledging to contribute $50 per year) and 65 Annual Members (pledging to contribute $50 per year).

With those contributions, the IBF granted $2,000 to the Indiana University Indianapolis Law School (now McKinney School of Law) on an unrestricted basis, $2,675 to the University of Chicago’s Law in American Society Foundation Seminar and $1,500 to the Indiana Criminal Justice Planning Commission in support of a bail research project.

By comparison, here are the current projected goals for IBF’s 2014 annual activity: There will be 1,300 contributors (27 percent of the IndyBar membership) and will raise approximately $250,000. The IBF can include among its contributors 17 Distinguished Senior Fellows (pledging to contribute $1,500 over three years) and 34 Distinguished Fellows (pledging to contribute $1,500 over five years).

With your contributions, the IBF has awarded the $35,000 Impact Fund Grant to the Joseph Maley Foundation to fund a new parent education and pro bono legal assistance program for central Indiana students in need of individualized education plans. Additionally, the IBF will grant the IndyBar approximately $105,000 to fund a variety of the IndyBar programs and initiatives, including but not limited to: Ask a Lawyer, Bankruptcy Help Line, Bench Bar Conference, Diversity Job Fair, Homeless Project, Hospice Program, Legal Line, Low Asset Wills, Marion County Superior Court Pro Bono Program, IndyBar Staff for Pro Bono Program Support, technology for online education, Web-based access to Bar Review and academic scholarships for law students, IndyBar Review, Applied Professionalism and Bench Bar.

During its 45-year existence, IBF donors have also taken on special projects that have had a meaningful impact on our community and the practice of law in Indianapolis, including funding the metal detectors for the City-County Building and the original children’s waiting room for the Marion Superior Courts.

Most recently, the 2013 Impact Fund Grant recipient, Indiana Legal Services Inc.’s Military Assistance Project (MAP), sponsored a free CLE that trained attorneys on MAP. In return, attendees agreed to staff a shift at IndyBar’s Oct. 14 Ask a Lawyer program at the Roudebush VA Medical Center and provide pro bono legal services addressing common legal issues encountered by Hoosier veterans. Having the opportunity to fulfill your pro bono duties through a program made possible by the IBF’s Impact Fund Grant is something in which all members of the IndyBar should take great pride.

The contributors to the IBF, comprised mostly of members of the Indianapolis Bar Association, make each of these initiatives possible. None of this could happen without their generosity and continued support. Every IndyBar member can make a tangible impact by donating to the IBF. Please commit to being a part of our Impact of One campaign, and donate your one billable hour at•

The Indianapolis Bar Assocation President Jeffrey A. Abrams, Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP, is out taking a much needed vacation.

Posted in Indianapolis Bar Foundation, IndyBar News, President's Message | Leave a comment

Getting Along Is Not Wrong: Law and the Golden Rule

Civility. Courtesy. Respect. Professionalism.

These are words that should be synonymous with “Advocate,” but in a world of high stakes, strong opinions, and a general societal decline in basic manners, how can attorneys fight the good fight while living up to these ideals – especially if the other side doesn’t? We set out to find examples of lawyers who model the way while providing excellent representation.

Getting Along is Not Wrong, an initiative of the IndyBar Standing Committee on Professionalism, is the impressive collection of such positive and compelling behavior. Check out the entry below and continue checking back for future installments.

The Hon. Gerald S. Zore, Marion Superior Court –

How often have you filed an emergency Motion for Continuance only to have an opposing counsel file an “Objection for the Record?” Frankly, I am amazed at how often attorneys file these coded objections to let the court know that while the attorney has no real objection, he or she is filing it only on behalf of the client. I assume the attorney then advises the client that that court granted the Motion for Continuance over his or her objection.

Why not be up front and tell your client that the opposing counsel or party had a legitimate emergency and the court granted the motion? I have had situations where a Motion for Continuance was filed due to emergency surgery for the client or the client’s spouse and the opposing counsel filed an “Objection for the Record.” Give me a break. Make it your practice to always consider the reasons stated in a Motion for Continuance and only file an objection if the reasons appear to be frivolous or without merit.

Attorneys should always apply the Golden Rule. Treat opposing counsel as you would like to be treated and you should have no problem in maintaining their respect for your professionalism.

Posted in IndyBar News, Professionalism | Leave a comment